Heating with water as fuel

A little nomenclature...
What is Brown's gas Brown's gas, which is often referred to as HHO or detonating gas (Browns Gas, HHO gas, fire damp, detonating gas, oxyhydrogen gas) is 2 parts hydrogen gas and one part oxygen in a certain volume .
The same elements, and in the same proportions, are present in Brown's gas and in water vapor, and also hydrogen and oxygen - industrially produced gases - all this diversity brings some confusion into the understanding of what Brown's gas is. Let's try to figure this out. Conventional oxygen and hydrogen, sold commercially or produced by conventional electrolysers, are supplied in the form of O2 and H2. That is, the molecules of both gases have two atoms. This is a more stable state of these gases than when the individual atoms are separated (charged ions) and each atom exists separately.

The problem with H2 and O2 as flammable gases is that before they can react to become H2O, they must be broken down into H and O atoms. The energy required to do this is most of what you get. when they interact to produce H2O.

What makes Brown's gas unique, and most valuable, is that it does not exist in the molecular form of H2 and O2 molecules. Here they are in a monatomic state (one atom per molecule). In this state, when the hydrogen burns (reacts with oxygen), 3.8 times more energy will be returned.

However, it is most important to note the results obtained when using Brown's gas in an internal combustion engine. Monatomic hydrogen is a super catalyst for various types of hydrocarbon-based fuels. Improved power, mileage and cleaner combustion (reduced emissions) have been reported by people who have injected Brown gas into the intake manifold.

It is known that fuel processing in internal combustion engines is inefficient. In the best case, only 40% of the fuel is burned - expensive and environmentally harmful gasoline or diesel. The remaining 60% successfully burns out in the exhaust pipe.

Detailed research on the topic was carried out by Yul Brown, who built a demonstration car and received a US patent for his development with confirmation of the experiment. This device consists of an electrolyzer, a circular tank, an optimizer, and a control system. The gas release method is based on the phenomenon of water electrolysis. The installed circular tank is intended to separate gas from water; it is also needed to supply the gas generator with electrolyte.

Similar experiments were carried out in Russia. Thus, Professor G.V. Dudko tested an internal combustion engine, which looked like a hybrid of a carburetor engine and a diesel engine. To start, you needed a glass of gasoline, after which the ignition was turned off, and ordinary water with special additives was supplied to the combustion chambers. It was preheated and strongly compressed. The engine was installed on the boat, and the testers sailed on it in the Sea of ​​Azov for 2 days, pouring water from overboard instead of gasoline.

In a Brown gas generator, the chemical reaction of electrolysis occurs directly in the electrolyzer, after which Brown gas - hydrogen and oxygen - is released. A special electrolyte is used, which consists of a catalyst and distilled water. The resulting gas leaves the upper fitting of the electrolyzer through a tube and is directed into a separate container - a water seal. It enters from below, is cleared of foam, rises as a gas above the water level, passes through a moisture filter, then through a check valve into the air manifold and from there into the combustion chamber.

Properties of water as fuel

The formula of water is known to almost everyone - H2O. It contains two hydrogen atoms (H2) and one oxygen (O2). They are connected to each other by a covalent bond. Here it is worth recalling the essence of any fuel. These are substances capable of oxidation under the influence of an oxidizing agent, which is oxygen.

The function of an oxide in water can be performed by an oxygen molecule (O2). Hydrogen (H2) becomes a kind of fuel. When it burns, it releases 3 times more energy than when using conventional natural gas, and 2 times more than when burning gasoline. It was these properties that formed the basis of the idea of ​​​​using water instead of fuel.

The feasibility of obtaining Brown's gas

Brown gas generators, whose operating principle is described above, have found their practical application in 2 areas:

• production of hydrogen fuel for cars;
• gas-flame work (welding and soldering of metals).

A car cannot drive with an electrolyzer on board, since it requires an external source of electricity. The standard battery does not last long, because it is necessary to expend more energy to produce Brown gas than the fuel itself releases when burned. Therefore, companies that are seriously developing the topic of hydrogen fuel for cars have introduced a scheme for refueling cars with fuel obtained from a separate generator.

The situation is better with welding and soldering of metals; hydrogen torches are used in many industries in Western Europe. Since the combustion temperature of Brown's gas (2235 °C) is lower than that of acetylene (2620 °C), and the combustion product is water vapor, many environmental safety measures have become unnecessary. The industrial gas generators used for this are very expensive, since to increase efficiency they use catalysts made from rare elements, including platinum.

Managers of one British manufacturing company calculated that the total cost of separating and using Brown's gas was equal to the cost of purchasing and delivering acetylene. Only burning hydrogen is safer and more environmentally friendly. Another thing is that its production consumes electricity produced by burning the same hydrocarbons.

At the moment, heating with Brown gas is extremely inefficient, because more energy is expended on the production of fuel than is obtained during its combustion. Existing electrolyzers are not yet able to provide high fuel yield at low cost. To see this, you should watch the video:

In the second minute of the footage, the readings of the generator instruments with the hydrogen burner running are clearly visible. Voltage is 250 V, current is 14 A, respectively, the power consumption of the device is 250 x 14 = 3500 W or 3.5 kW. Now the question is: can such a torch heat water to heat a room of at least 30 m2? It is even visually noticeable that it is not. A simple electric boiler with a power of 3.5 kW will easily heat a room of up to 40 m2.

Conclusion: Brown's combustible gas cannot be compared to conventional electric heaters for heating at home. Too much energy is spent on its release from water, which means it is impractical to use it for heating. Producing hydrogen yourself can be done as a hobby or as an experiment.

Is there an everlasting log?

In reality, this is not a log, but an ordinary metal tank (pipe), welded on both sides. On top along the entire length there are holes in it for steam to escape. The pipe itself also has a hole that can be closed using a valve after the entire volume is filled with water.

You can use cold, but hot will heat up faster. How the device works:

1. The tank is placed at the very bottom of the stove. On the left, right and top they cover it with ordinary logs. The stove is lit.
2. When heated to a high temperature, water vapor begins to escape from the pipe.
3. It enters the burning coals, mixing with air. The specific heat capacity of such a mixture is 2 times greater than that of ordinary air. Water vapor has a heat capacity of 2.14 kJ/kg·K, and air - 1 kJ/kg·K.

The results of such an experiment, according to the statements of those who conducted it:

• Black soot comes out of the smoke. This is explained by the reaction of carbon particles with oxygen.
• The flame becomes more intense, with long tongues.
• Wood burns longer: 1 hour 40 minutes. compared to 1 hour 10 minutes. when burning without an eternal log. Time increases by 40%.

How to fill a heating system with water

To understand how to fill a heating system operating on the bottom-fill principle with water, you should remember the following algorithm of actions:

• even before filling the heating system in a private house, the valve on the supply pipeline must be pushed in, and the discharge must be opened on the supply section;
• Then on the return pipe you need to slowly open the valve. If the outlet speed of the water in the heating system is high, there is a risk of water hammer, which can lead to the most unpleasant consequences, including the separation of heating batteries;
• Next you need to wait until the water, devoid of air, flows;
• then the discharge is closed, and the supply valve, on the contrary, opens;
• after this, you need to completely de-air all heating areas in the entrance to which you have access, including service premises.

It is important to remember that the circulation of water in a heating system with top filling is different, so filling such a pipeline with coolant is much easier. To do this, it will be enough to slowly open the valves on the supply and return (the vents are closed), and then remove the air from the vent in the expansion tank, which is located in the attic of a multi-story building.

Why is it still not drowned with water?

Intermolecular water bonds arise and break much more easily than intramolecular ones. Therefore, it was decided to use them in heat transfer processes. Chemists have experimentally found that the energy of intermolecular bonds of water ranges from 0.26 to 0.5 eV (electron volts).

The problem is that to obtain fuel from water, it must be broken down into its components. In simple words, it needs to be decomposed into oxygen and hydrogen, then burn the hydrogen and get water again. Cleavage is achieved by passing an electric current through the liquid.

When boiling, water does not break into individual molecules, but only evaporates. Heating from normal combustion does not cause any other reactions in the liquid. Moreover, this process also requires a lot of energy, which could be used usefully. Eg:

• burning 1 kg of dry wood with a moisture content of no more than 20% gives about 3.9 kW;
• if the wood moisture level rises to 50%, then only 2.2 kW is released from 1 kg.

The decomposition of water to produce actual combustion requires significant energy expenditure. Much more of it is needed than will be released when the recovered elements are used again as fuel. An approximate ratio can be given:

• 100% of energy is for splitting;
• 75% of energy comes from burning recovered components.

It is the fact that the reverse reaction of released hydrogen and oxygen releases less energy that is the reason why water is still not used as a fuel for cars and other things. Economically, this method turned out to be unprofitable. It is more feasible to make fuel from garbage. It can be liquid, gaseous and solid.

Is there a "water" car?

In 2008, in Japan, a “water” car was presented by Genepax at an exhibition in Osaka. The fuel could be a glass of tap or river water, or even regular soda.

Fuel from water using Yuri Krasnov's method

Water based fuel

In NPO im. Lavochkina, scientists Yuri Krasnov and Evgeniy Antonov came up with a completely new type of fuel, which contains water. This new fuel is a hundred times cheaper than diesel fuel, much more environmentally friendly and much easier to produce...

Do you think the Russian ministers were happy about this? Not at all! Despite direct instructions from above about implementation, officials are using all means to slow down the industrial implementation of these ideas, which eloquently indicates mass sabotage, which is one of their main types of activity.

What are the other officials who gave this order doing at this time?

They are not doing anything and are not going to do anything! They are the main organizers of the bureaucratic coven. The chatterboxes flashing on TV, blaring at us about innovations, about Skolkovo and nanocity, are also not interested in their speedy implementation. On the contrary, they are interested in ensuring that everything that real scientists come up with is immediately transferred to the West. This is why they were placed there by their masters - social parasites who have seized the subsoil and remnants of Russian industry into their hands...

Below we present a shortened interview with Yuri Krasnov given to the Agency of Popular Information (API). This interview is quite widely distributed on the Internet, but is missing from the website of the said Agency after the change of owner...

Fuel from water. Hydrogen fuel by Yuri Krasnov

– Yuri Ivanovich, today our civilization has reached a critical point in its development. None of the world leaders and scientists can answer the eternal question “What to do?” The most striking example is financial chaos, which none of the Nobel laureates, not to mention outstanding economists, said a word about before its occurrence. But the economic collapse, as far as one can judge, is only the beginning of a total crisis of our entire civilization. You, in turn, have technologies that can stop and prevent many unpleasant processes within a fairly short time. What was the impetus for the creation of alternative energy?

– 400 years of so-called progress have led to the fact that, on a planetary scale, the habitat has become unsuitable for normal human existence. Today, the atmosphere, the air, largely consists of anthropogenic waste from our activities. The land, which from time immemorial has provided green grass, according to the biblical expression, has ceased to do so. She bears thorns.

People have lost the concept of good and evil. Everything was mixed up. What is conscience? Where can I buy this and how much does it cost? By the concept of good and evil, I mean a serious category, and not the one in the joke about the Zulu, to whom the missionary says: “The main thing, my son, you understand - if a Zulu stole a bull from me, this is evil, but if I stealing a bull from a Zulu is good.” So, it’s time to end this Zulu logic, because our ball is small.

Even rich people say: “You can’t buy in a store. You can't do it in the market either. And in the West, food is genetically modified. What should we eat? Already 50 kilometers from Moscow there is smog. The rivers are poisoned. The entire aquatic habitat is distorted, and very seriously distorted. In North America, the earth is dead, nothing can grow there without chemistry, but with chemistry it grows. And these are genetically modified products. If we plant our healthy wheat there, it will not grow in America or England. The humus layer there has been destroyed, and this is the layer of earth that gives life.

So, the water is poisoned, the atmosphere is poisoned and the earth, as an intermediate layer that provides our daily bread, is also poisoned. Poisoned by human activity, and not only on the physical and chemical planes, but also by the thoughts, deeds, and actions of each of us. True, this is not yet so clearly visible, but the earth is already burning in the literal sense of the word.

According to confidential data from the FAO committee at the UN, 90 percent of all greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere are gases produced by the combustion of bacteria. When chemicals enter the ground, living bacteria try to rearrange the man-made chemical elements. At the same time, living bacteria die in an unequal struggle, and when they die, carbon dioxide is released. And it is these gases that leave up to 90 percent of the atmosphere. This is scary!

Not only are we destroying the living essence of the earth and making the soil dead, we are also creating global instability of the planet, changing its energy balance and increasing the temperature. The cataclysms of recent years throughout the Earth are just flowers. Therefore, either by God’s providence the time during which people stop throwing poison into the ground is prolonged, or man will simply cease to exist as a species.

But life won't stop there. How it was established after the Flood, which is a historical fact. But this will be a different life, there will be a different Sky, a different Earth, with different physical characteristics, with different electric and magnetic fields, the characteristics of the Earth’s rotation will change. Everything will change. And everything is heading exactly towards this, if, by the great mercy from above, we still manage to stop the so-called progress.

– It turns out that the technocratic path of development that humanity has followed turned out to be erroneous and in a short period of time confronted people with the fact of self-destruction? Realizing this, any normal person will simply scream: what to do? What power will help us to be saved?

– Remember the saying: “Knowledge is power”? This will help. But there are no forces in the usual sense - financial and administrative. But there are technologies that can literally restore the fertility of the land within a year. There is absolute fuel, for the production of which you don’t need to dig into the ground to take what you didn’t put there and when burning coal, for example, for 1 kilogram of coal you take 18 kilograms of oxygen from the atmosphere, and throw it all out together, and then breathe it.

Then all this falls into the water and into the ground, and it must be eaten. I'm not even talking about direct waste, about the washouts of the chemicals that we pour onto the fields. In England, for example, they poured up to 200 kilograms per hectare, not counting pesticides. And where does all this end up? In the water, which somewhere falls partially on our heads in the form of acid rain, and the Scandinavians and Germans definitely get it.

So, we have solved this problem – the energy problem. Water burns under certain conditions. When a kilogram of water is burned, water, roughly speaking, is also formed, only in a different state - in vapor form, which, rising to the upper layers of the atmosphere, thanks to the Earth’s magnetic field and natural processes, returns to us in its pure form. By stopping the use of chemistry, we stop disturbing Mother Earth, we do not touch its subsoil. We leave alone the oil lenses, which are not yet clear what role they play in the body of the planet.

The Earth is not just a spinning ball, it is a more complex system. I cannot say that this is an intelligent system, but that it is a living system with forward and backward connections - this is a fact that even the most orthodox so-called scientists recognize.

– What do you do with water if it burns no worse than gasoline and can be poured into car tanks? Will humanity forget the taste of normal water if it is used en masse as fuel?

– This is ordinary water, which, purely mechanically, passes through certain forms in which vortices, whirlpools, and breakers are created, familiar to us all from streams and rivers. Only all these breakers are more intense. There is no artificial influence - electric, magnetic, shock. There is simply a natural flow of water, as in nature, where it flows into springs from a depth of several kilometers and is considered ideal and alive. Imagine the pressure she is under there. Each molecule passes through the pores of basalt, granite, and other rocks. We took this same process, looked at it from Mother Nature and emphasized it a little, strengthened it, nothing more.

As a result of this, the so-called water acquires completely unique properties. Firstly, its density is significantly higher than unity; it can reach up to 1.25. We manage the processes in the installation.

The addition of, say, 99 percent water and 1 percent any hydrocarbons in homeopathic doses - it could be alcohol, it could even be, excuse me, feces - creates conditions under which the bonds between water molecules are weakened. It is enough to add high temperature, synthesis begins, the reverse process of combining oxygen with hydrogen, releasing heat and water vapor. Everything is very simple.

Taking 1 kilogram of water, we create conditions under which the oxygen contained in water (1 molecule) combines with two hydrogen molecules, producing the same water, but only in a different state - vapor. And at the same time, as a side effect, heat appears, which a person uses for heating or for mechanical rotation through a turbine.

But the output is the same 1 kilogram, it has not gone away. And thanks to the gradient of the magnetic and electric fields, it was restored and returned to us in the same form in which we took it. That is, this is an open system - they took a kilogram of water, communicated it with the upper layers of the atmosphere and again received the same kilogram.

This is a waste-free technology that is gentle and fits into nature, and does not deny it, as is done on the path of scientific and technological progress, completely discarding nature. We conquered it with an ax, with moldboard plowing - we turned over the humus layer, the bacteria died in the sun and released a dose of CO into the atmosphere, and the bacteria that were accustomed to the heat also died when turned over and also released CO. The next year they just had time to adapt, we turn it around again. And this happens on a scale comparable to the area of ​​the continents, which led to the collapse.

– How long will it take to transfer the main production facilities to the new fuel?

– To begin mass, I emphasize, not serial, but mass production of installations from the cottage version to very large power plants powered by liquid fuel, it takes from three to five years. And then there will be no need to build oil and gas pipelines. Especially if you make autonomous power plants, say, based on aircraft engines, where gas turbines are used. Only they will run on a different fuel, but the physics is the same. Water, burning at a high temperature, produces water vapor, which rotates the blades of the turbine, on the shaft of which the generator sits. And this autonomous installation can be made for a hundred, a thousand or a million kilowatts. Depending on the need. It's all a matter of technology.

– Why is the interval estimated at 3-5 years?

- This is a very short period of time. Cities with a population of over a million will take more time. But the problem must begin to be solved, given the immensity of the vastness of our Mother Russia, from small towns and villages.

– Even a schoolchild now understands that your developments can become gravediggers of scientific and technological progress. Obviously, their implementation is unprofitable for managers of underground subsoil. But it is obvious that tomorrow these technologies will still come and ephemeral millions will turn into dust. Should there be at least some logic in the heads of businessmen? If you are a reasonable person, invest some of your money in new technologies and tomorrow you will be on your horse again? Logical?

- Logical. But there is a joke about a scorpion and a frog that circulated among us during our student years. “The scorpion is running to his scorpion. There is a stream on the way. He can't swim across it. He looks at a frog sitting on the shore. Scorpio says: “Frog, please take me to the other side.” The frog replies: “With pleasure, but you will sting me!” Scorpio: “How can I sting you if I need to cross.” The frog took pity: “Okay, sit down.” They swim to the middle of the stream, the scorpion stings her, and both go to the bottom. The frog asks: “Scorpio, what are you doing?” He answered: “Well, that’s how I’m made.”

– How many scientists share your philosophical point of view and recognize your technologies?

- No. And this happens not only in Russia. Everything happened after the war. Science has become the handmaiden of business. Scientists eat from the hand of business and do what they are told. Nobody cares about the truth. Therefore, they either close their eyes, like those monkeys who “see nothing, hear nothing.” Or they aggressively deny it “a la Kruglikov” with his pseudoscience laboratory.

Because they understand that if we acknowledge what we are talking about, the question will inevitably arise: “What did you, associate professors, do with the candidates?” The state feeds you, waters you, gives you mansions and privileges. For what? This is Gogol's widow. And this is a natural process, an embryo inside a system that has simply served its purpose due to natural reasons. And any system tries to hold on until the end and fights what is against it. They cannot fight openly because there are no arguments. But silent sabotage does take place...

Comments:

1. Sooner or later, oligarchs and businessmen will choke and think why it’s hard to breathe on the streets of their beloved city, maybe then these clowns will remember Mother Nature. May F1 save us, may F2 save us, in the name of control, alt and holy divide... Enter

   — Egor · Nov 15, 19:37 ·

2. I can’t understand from whose perspective this story is told. Apparently from an outside observer who knows nothing about the invention. And what do the main characters think, how to get something from this, and if they were thinking about the planet, they would remember about the wheel that everyone uses and no one pays, they came up with a technology and spread it to the people, we are not stupid if it is not required for implementation to fly to the moon, everyone in the yards would have collected it and wouldn’t have bought gasoline, and the planet said thank you. But probably everyone is looking for profit, everyone is rotten and there is no need to shame the hucksters and rulers, they are designed for this, but it may not be too late to call your familiar inventors to conscience. Although I have little faith in it. And the wheel helps ordinary people live and they don’t even have anyone to thank.

   — Nikolaevich · Jan 27, 17:48 ·

3. Yes its true! You know a tricky thing - post the drawings on the Internet! People are complaining that Mother Nature won’t stand it... Never mind, we’ll figure it out on our own without them, and then no one will profit from it. Sit and wait for your patents to continue.

   — People · Feb 13, 23:34 ·

4. I have been looking for a long time for a really working scheme for the production of such fuel... Yes, only one, in Russian, p*** and chatter... At least one bastard can post a working scheme for producing such fuel. Otherwise, it turns out that some people pray for it, while others curse it... There is a lot of information about Stanley Meer’s hydrogen cell - do it - it works, but does not give much result. And here is one p*****...

   — Finn · Aug 22, 01:08 ·

5. I saw a program about Yuri Krasnov and his invention, he demonstrated water that burns to some foreign freak. The freak couldn’t believe it for a long time, he was convinced many times that everything worked. And when he was convinced, he offered 6 billion euros or something like that. Yuri refused this huckster. Technology this level cannot be posted on the Internet. Industrial espionage has not been abolished. There is even this type of intelligence (they scour periodicals and the Internet). And Yuri is great! He made me respect myself 2 times in a row: 1 time for a powerful invention, and 2 times for patriotism (MARKED a foreigner) Although any of the above critics would have sold the invention and therefore the Motherland for 6 billion euros without straining

   — Vasya · Jan 17, 16:21 ·

6. Something, I don’t understand, Krasnov, where are you, what the hell is espionage, what are the Altgarhs, what is still unclear, no one will finance such projects and inventions, they are unnecessary to anyone. So give others the opportunity to live better, make the technology public. Do you hear? Or are you, like everyone else, waiting for more than 6m?

   — dim · Dec 21, 15:13 ·

7. rave

   — Vlad Jan 25, 14:13

8. About five years ago, Krasnov demonstrated his technology (structured water) on television. He added a little diesel fuel to his water and mixed the contents. Then he put a piece of paper in there, took out the ignition and it caught fire. The presenter of the program, Galeleo, was on the jury. Who suggested that this is a trick. This leader took a straw, put it in the water and drew water from the bottom of the vessel into another vessel. Then he also wetted a piece of paper with this “structured water” and they began to set this piece of paper on fire, but no matter how hard they tried, they couldn’t set it on fire. (there was diesel only upstairs). The trick has been revealed. Krasnov has disgraced himself, but nevertheless is looking for a new audience.

   — Sergey · Feb 19, 08:53 ·

9. I don’t think about it, but I started doing it. We are talking about structuring or destructuring (a question of definitions) of a substance called water. There are a lot of fairy tales on the net, but I haven’t found a truly research approach on the net. (apparently I searched poorly). So whether the water burns or not is the tenth question. And the fact that with the help of a changed structure it is possible to obtain high-quality food products is the main thing (I think so). Both Yutkin and Krasnov wrote about this effect. If, instead of genetically modified products, we start supplying the market with truly good quality food, then I think that in terms of efficiency it will be no worse than fuel, and maybe even better. When the doctor is full, the patient feels better!!! I understand that the chemical industry will suffer, but it is better for it to redirect its efforts in a different direction than the production of fertilizers. This is what I think.

   — Alexander · Feb 27, 10:08 ·

10. did not understand and is ready for consideration. many acquaintances

    — Nikolay Vasilievich · Dec 14, 18:42 ·

11. type the name HAMLET AOAKELYAN scientist from the Russian Federation. There are all the drawings and videos of working copies.... Good luck everyone

    — kemal · Jan 5, 13:40 ·

12. This is all pseudoscientific nonsense, something like trsion fields.

    — Dmitry · Mar 12, 20:09 ·

13. As soon as Krasnov’s works began to be discussed, the oil trolls came in and called everything nonsense. That's how we live. There is nothing except oil (insanely expensive). We won’t let someone invent something.

    — KhiMiCh · Aug 8, 18:50 ·

14. Damn the bald uncle Krasnov will tell you or help you. Boil the oil with water for as long as you like or tear the eggplants - you won’t succeed. Because this fart most of all wants bobble and recognition, so he writes letters to Vova and other Kremlin bastards, with proposals for the implementation of his invention. Naive idiot! He will die with the idea of ​​getting rich, but he will never give anything to anyone. Its advertising website was closed - ah-ah-ah.

    — Toivo · Jul 19, 05:04 ·

15. Water is a product of the combustion of hydrogen. That is, burnt hydrogen. During combustion, a single electron goes to oxygen. The inventor thinks that it is still possible to take away an electron? Hydrogen has one.

    Okay, let's split the water into hydrogen and oxygen. They burned it again (oxidized hydrogen). Taking into account losses, the efficiency of this process is less than 100% (heat loss). Where can we get the excess energy to make the process energetically beneficial?

    — Alexander Eduardovich · Jan 16, 17:44 ·

16. Friends! This is not a nuclear reaction, where there are bonds, splitting and energy release. It's a cycle. And in a cycle you cannot break the connections and by reassembling them into the same thing, you will also receive energy. Well, there is no such thing as a perpetual motion machine - they teach it in school. Stop the nonsense about bad officials, they seem to have studied at school.

    — Yuri Viktorovich · Jul 15, 00:55 ·

17. Hello good people. I live in a vacant lot where there used to be a good farm. I wanted it and I could. River, forest, ponds. I work both in the field and in the service. Built housing. With a furnace of complexity. Firewood is expensive and a lot of hassle. There is no gas and there never will be. (There is no point in screaming). Electricity is becoming more expensive. There was the Gollan boiler, then the Scorpion boiler. Very expensive. I installed a cavitation unit with a coefficient of transformations 1.3. It's gotten better, but the whole house is buzzing. This year is on the panels of Tlyustenkhabl. I'm eager to try Yu.I.'s method. Krasnova. But there is no specificity. And any practice requires this. Give me something that works! As they used to joke: for residents of the Far North. This is so much, this is so much, how to mix and how much, what to add to the boiler or motor. Has anyone tried it and got results? Otherwise, sheer malice, and, to our shame, swearing. Have you forgotten about honor? Who are we? We live in Rus'! Russians. (AS my friend Alexander Kalutskov correctly added, May the Kingdom of Heaven be upon him), of any nationality. With respect to everyone NOT INDIFFERENT, priest of the Russian Orthodox Church, paratrooper officer, master of sports of the USSR, parachutist, archpriest Igor Bobrikov. More details on the page of the Maykop Diocese, Church of the Life-Giving Cross of the Lord.

    — Father Igor Borisovich Bobrikov · Jul 19, 19:05 ·

Hydrogen in wartime carsHydrogen fuel

Adding water to regular fuel

Water can be used as fuel for your car as part of regular diesel fuel. This is another assumption that was put forward by “home” inventors. It turned out that when you add a small amount of diesel fuel to a bottle of water, the resulting mixture burns. Moreover, less soot is released, and the combustion process becomes more violent.

Also, during the burning process of a piece of paper dipped into the resulting mixture, a cracking sound appears, but this only indicates the evaporation of the liquid. In addition, shaking does not dissolve the diesel fuel in the water. There will be no homogeneous mixture here. Over time, diesel fuel, like oil or gasoline, collects on the surface.

A similar experiment was carried out with a tractor, into which diesel fuel and water, mixed in certain proportions, were poured. The unit started up and began to rattle, standing still. But that’s all the energy of such fuel is enough for. And there is a high risk that the engine will fail.

How to get hydrogen at home?

On the Internet you can easily find drawings and diagrams of a wide variety of homemade installations that allow you to extract Brown's gas from water. If you filter out the information garbage related to this topic, it turns out that you can get hydrogen at home in two ways. The first is to purchase a ready-made electrolyzer; these are already commercially available. One problem is that their price is too high, and the efficiency is unknown.

When buying a hydrogen generator, you need to understand that it will not be a panacea for you in terms of heating. The price of equipment and consumed electricity will be higher than simple electric heating of water, so there is no talk of payback.

As an experiment, you can make a Brown gas generator with your own hands, which allows you to release a small amount of fuel. It is unlikely to be used to heat a building, but it may well be enough to power a small burner for melting metal. First, you need to make an electrolyzer, which is a container of water in which the electrodes are immersed. The larger the surface area of ​​the electrodes, the higher the productivity of the installation. Steel plates of arbitrary size attached to a dielectric base are suitable. The working diagram of the device is shown in the figure:

The electrodes are lowered into a hermetically sealed container of water, where ordinary salt is added to improve the reaction. A gas tube comes out through the lid and goes into the second vessel, which is a water seal; it is filled 2/3 with water.

The second tube coming out of this container is connected to the burner. It is better to supply voltage to the electrodes using an autotransformer, monitoring its value with a multimeter. How to assemble a Brown mini-gas generator with your own hands is shown in the video:

Attention! If you have managed to achieve any significant installation performance, the burner should be connected to the tube through a check valve to avoid backlash and explosion.

Development prospects

Today, no real developments have yet been created that would allow the use of water as an alternative fuel. It has only been confirmed that adding it or hydrogen to the combustible mixture helps to increase engine efficiency.

So, if the admixture makes up 25-35% of the volume of diesel fuel, emissions of nitrogen oxides into the atmosphere are reduced, and fuel-economic indicators increase. This fact was confirmed back in the 80s of the last century. But real tests also showed that the precipitation of salts during combustion leads to increased engine wear. As a result, the economic effect is reduced to nothing.

If we evaluate the prospects for the use of alternative energy sources and fuels, it should be noted that this takes time. In the case of water, we can only hope that in the process of their experiments the inventors will still be able to reach the point where the car can be refueled from the tap.

The principle of starting an open type heating system, water preparation

There are no difficulties in such work, since no calculation of water in a heating system of this type needs to be performed. All that is required is to pour several buckets of water into the expansion tank so that it is visible at the bottom. It is absolutely not worth trying to fill a closed-type heating system with some reserve, otherwise, due to the heating of the coolant during the operation of the heating system, its volume will increase and water will flow over the edge of the expansion tank.

If the entire system is assembled with your own hands, it is very important to check all the joints of the equipment parts and its threads in order to avoid leaks in the future. Read also: “How to fill a heating system - types of coolants and filling rules.”